Showing posts with label Recycling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recycling. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

Covid-19, Global Economy, Ecosystems, and Circular Economy Strategies

 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344920304869

Title:  "A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies".
From the journal, Resources, Conservation, & Recycling.
At least read the conclusion.  The whole piece is a good analysis of a crucial situation.

Again, I don't believe that the Circular Economy approach is the full answer to the socio-eco-econ Crisis we're in, but it is popular.  Perhaps it's a good First Step toward a version of Ecological Economics which will truly address the problems of unlimited growth and overconsumption.
..............
Not only my opinion.  Stay Well

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Preventing the Circular Economy (CE) Concept From Disintegrating

 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344917302835?dgcid=raven_sd_recommender_email

In the journal article at the link above, the authors maintain that the CE concept may be in danger of collapse due to a lack of agreement among scholars & practitioners as to exactly what it means.  As a result, they say, certain important elements (e.g., social equity, sustainable development) of CE are slighted in planning.  [Keep in mind, this article was published almost three years ago.]

 After a detailed description of the paper's research methods, the article then presents "the first comprehensive and systematic analysis of CE definitions...".  Essentially--- solicited, written, and qualitative definitions of 114 CE terms/elements were coded, analyzed, and quantified.

Section "4. Conclusion" reveals the important results, and should be read by those working with the CE concept.  A few examples of the results follow:
1.  a much needed definition of CE;
2.  the suggestion that some of the authors of the solicited definitions have no idea what CE is really about; and,
3.  some of those authors entirely equate CE with recycling.
.......................................
In my view, the article contributes to reducing the lack of coherence in the CE arena.  I still maintain, though, that CE appears to be solidly wedded to the concept of "unlimited economic growth".  As such, it ignores the role of entropy in the biophysical world, and the common sense observation that Spaceship Earth is finite.  Relying on Julian Simon's contention that human inventiveness and production efficiency will overcome any obstacles is not realistic.  Nevertheless, given current political climates around the world, CE may be a good FIRST STEP (& only that) toward a genuinely sustainable habitat.  But first, CE researchers, policy makers, and practitioners need to cohere on what constitutes the Circular Economy.  If they don't, the concept likely will dissolve, fade away, or become nothing more than circularity for the sake of circularity.
......................................
Not only my opinion.  Be Well

Saturday, October 3, 2020

In the EU, "Is this the end of end-of-waste?", re the Circular Economy in 2020

 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344919305622?dgcid=raven_sd_recommender_email

At the link above, there's a brief review of the status of the end-of-waste policy in the EU.  End-of-waste is a crucial concept in the whole idea of the Circular Economy.  The EU is having a problem with implementation of the concept.  The authors of the article, Johansson and Forsgren, suggest a new approach involving the "space between waste and products".




[NOTE:  I've used this blogger venue for a bit over thirteen years.  Sometimes it allows active links to be posted, and other times the reader (you) has to copy the link here and then manually post it on a new page.  As far as I know, I have no control over which type of link posts here, i.e., an "active" one or a "copy & paste" one.  I suspect that Google only allows active links for those which go to sites owned by Google (e.g., YouTube), but I really don't know.  Point being:  apologies for all the "copy & paste" links in these posts; I can't do anything about it.]
.................................
Happy Trails